The Engage Family Blog

Official Blog of The Family Policy Council of West Virginia

Former Lesbian Miller Vows to Protect Child

with 5 comments

Must protect child from former lover, courts.


West Virginia, January 12, 2009 ( In October I brought you the story of Lisa Miller, an ex-lesbian- turned Christian, fighting to protect her daughter from her former lesbian lover Janet Jenkins. Isabella, the six year old at the center of this bitter court case told her mother that she wanted to commit suicide after visiting with Jenkins.


I continue to be appalled by the judges who order unsupervised visits with Jenkins for Isabella, despite knowing the negative emotional and psychological effects those visits have caused the child. In any other case where a child exhibits these kinds of negative effects a judge would immediately stop all unsupervised visits and begin investigation proceedings.


But, since this is an issue between two former lesbian lovers who were in a civil union, judges seem more interested in helping advance the homosexual agenda than protecting the well-being of an innocent child. And that fact alone is despicable.


Now Miller has announced that in the best interest of her child she will end all unsupervised visits with Jenkins, according to Lifesitenews.


Such a move, “which is in direct defiance of numerous court orders, may result in heavy fines, jail time, and loss of custody of her six year old child to lesbian Janet Jenkins.” But Miller reiterates that “God doesn’t want her in that situation with Janet. Isabella doesn’t want to go. She says that Janet is not her mom.”


And that is exactly the point that the homosexual community and same-sex supporters do not want to address, publicize, or talk about. The issue of same-sex marriage is not a simple one. And one of the most difficult aspects of it involves innocent children adopted, or conceived through various methods while two homosexuals are together, and what happens to them if the union dissolves.


In a heterosexual case the children generally go with the mother, though at times the father is the best fit for the kids. This is simple and easy to accomplish because both mom and dad are biological parents to the children. But not so in a homosexual civil union.


Here is a perfect example of a biological mom wanting to protect her child from a non-biological parent. It is the same as if two roommates lived together for six years, during which one roommate got pregnant and had a child, and when the now mom decides to move out the non-biological roommate demands partial custody of the child.


It’s ludicrous. No court in the world would entertain such a case. And yet that is exactly what is happening here. A non-biological person is demanding custody of a child on the grounds that she has a right via her former civil union status. And the courts are playing games with this child’s well-being just so they can try to advance the homosexual agenda. It’s disgusting.


What’s the lesson here? Don’t mess with the family. Children should be raised by their biological parents, a mom and dad, because despite what the liberals and homosexuals try and tell us, kids need a mom and dad.


Further Food for Thought:

An Interview with Lisa Miller


Enjoy this post?  Get more like them by subscribing to the Family Voice, the official blog of the Family Policy Council of West Virginia






Written by Nathan Cherry

January 12, 2009 at 2:56 pm

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. this is ridiculous post from a homophobe. geez. show me the child and stop tormenting the poor other mom.

    and finally, stop meddling in other people’s business.



    January 13, 2009 at 11:08 am

  2. Lesfriendly,

    How is this post “homophobic?” There was nothing in here that aluded to one iota of a phobia towards homosexual behavior. If anything I came away with the strong notion of the importance of support the institution of marriage – between one man and one woman.

    I’m shocked that you commented to stop tormenting the other mom? Out of love for the child the “other mom” should be stopped from tormenting a defenseless child who is obviously undergoing emotional distress.

    Relating news of an event is not meddling in other people’s business. Unfortunately a case like this requires other people to become involved so that true justice can be inacted and the wellbeing of this child is secured.

    Jesse Wisnewski

    January 14, 2009 at 2:33 am

  3. Here’s what’s sick. If two people decide together to make a child, regardless of who’s biology is or isn’t involved (because sometimes married men and women also use donor sperm), and regardless of whether either party has a change of heart about their situation, for either party to then use their child to further some personal agenda….be it to fly the flag for gay rights OR to make a point about Christian values…putting that child in middle as the pawn is the worst sort of negligent parenting I can imagine. They have done what they have done, it is what it is, and now they need to help their child have a healthy attitude about the place they find themselves.


    January 14, 2009 at 10:46 am

  4. Wow. Nice post. This has it all, from Liberal activist judges trying to legislate to pointing out the simple fact that children need a mom and a dad. Thank you for the update on this situation!


    January 14, 2009 at 7:43 pm

  5. […] Food for Thought: Former Lesbian Miller Vows to Protect Child Sears Wants to Make […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: