The Engage Family Blog

Official Blog of The Family Policy Council of West Virginia West Virginians rally for traditional marriage

with 3 comments

via West Virginians rally for traditional marriage

The American Family Association Radio report, One News Now, provides this coverage of our efforts to defend marriage as between one man and one woman in West Virginia.  Click on the link to read the story.  Audio of the story is available on the website as well.


Written by Jeremy Dys

December 2, 2008 at 2:31 pm

Posted in Marriage

Tagged with ,

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] West Virginians rally for traditional marriage […]

  2. […] Click here for the coverage of the push for a marriage amendment in West Virginia […]

  3. The forgoing is now being taken into circumspect consideration Nation Wide.

    The forgoing will protect the sanctity of marriage for all time. Equating the equality of our Great Nation.


    —–Albert Einstein—-

    I am going to draw a parallel in regards to the inappropriateness of such a “ban” of which equated inequality.

    This parallel circumvolves Christmas and Christ’s Birthday. Let us, if you will, hypothesize that we ” ban ” either one of these aspects of our Holiday for the sanctity of the other. Whom among us would be angry !?!

    Have you hugged your opponent today !?!

    This Day 84, Days since the signing of our Declaration of Independence.) Our American Democracy is like a ship on the ocean. If our rudder is off just a fraction we will be way off course by the time we are thinking we have reached our charted destination. We will find ourselves searching for land. I am working on our rudder
    I will not be one searching for land.
    TODAY is 84,

    Mr. President,
    My sincerest apologies. I spoke with a psychiatrist and he explained. When one is Angry. one tends to be oblivious to the rest of the world around them. This Not unlike those who wish to preserve the Sanctity of Marriage who have occurred inequality . Not unlike those of us who require equality who construe The “Origin” Of Marriage . It is called an amygdala /emotional high jacking. You see. We receive our information to the amygdala milliseconds before we receive the information to our frontal lobes for processing. Mr. President. What I am talking about is a Proclamation Compromise of which would be enacted forthwith for equality for all. I understand that forthwith translates to be a timely manner. Of course then their would be propositions, on a state level, nationwide for it to become an Amendment. If we so choose. Their after it would be ratified by the senate and house as an Amendment.


    The “origin” of Marriage is one man one woman. Rather or not it can be construed otherwise. The “Origin” remains the same. What we have done is compromised our American Democracy by even suggesting a ” Ban ” EQUATING INEQUALITY. As a result of our social Idealism. Marriage one man one woman. We have enacted disenfranchising those same sex couples without offering a solution within the same proposition. Equating the Inequality of our Nation. We have done the wrong thing / enacted inequality. For the right reason / The Sanctity of Marriage. I suspect those voting against same sex marriage. Do want equality for all. Those who voted for same sex marriage where doing the exact opposite. The right thing / for equality. for the wrong reason same sex marriage… It is inappropriate. Our nation is 84, days old. I am 16,071.rm days old. Kinda puts the youth of our nation into perspective. I have been alive for about 1/5th of our Great Nations History. I am 43 years old. I URGE YOU GO FORTH WITH A HEART OF A CHILD and DO THE RIGHT THING FOR THE RIGHT REASON. SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE AND EQUALITY FOR ALL.

    When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to “resolve”
    the political “bans” which have “disconnected” them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Natures God entitled them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them “resolved”.
    This revised in parenthesis is from The United States Declaration of Independence. July 4.1776.
    I humbly submit for your circumspect evaluation , The Compromise of ??/??/????, which
    “would be” the 28th Amendment of the constitution of these United States of America.
    This is in regards to the sanctity of our American democracy, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence:
    “We hold these truths to be self evident … that all men are created equal.”
    This excerpt is from our Declaration of Independence and the Compromise ( Of which was enacted forthwith/a timely manner) of 1850 in regards to slavery. .
    I humbly submit that, for the sanctity of marriage and equality for all, The Compromise of ??/??/????, whereas, nation wide, same sex partners are granted the same rights as one man and one woman in marriage.
    The Document would be entitled “A Civil Union.”

    On the same document, in the header, it would read:
    Marriage: One man, one woman. ____________ Go to section A
    Coupling: Same sex. ___________ Go to section B
    Section A : Marriage Certificate>>>
    Section B: Coupling Certificate>>>
    Whereby selection of either would enact the same.
    Same Document, Same Rights. Different Certificate.

    I have written in regards to the sanctity of our American democracy, Marriage, and equality for all. This is in regards to the would be “up and coming” 28th Amendment of the United States. I have suggested, for the Sanctity of Marriage, and equality for all. A compromise. This compromise is in which where same sex coupling would be proclamated as the compromise of ??/??/????, then,
    ” may be” written into the 28th Amendment which would grant equal rights to all and settle the civil unrest that is upon us. I have referred to various great American documents throughout history to validate my determination in regards to the “Origin” , sanctity and institution of Coupling/Same sex Coupling. I believe this is a national issue. I am a homosexual. I am in a 24 year relationship with the love of my life. My love lives in beautiful up state Oregon and I live in sunny southern California. If one state or the other instituted same sex coupling and the other did not. When one or the other crosses state lines our union would not be recognized. This unless both states recognize same sex coupling. I have suggested that we will be able to build our own traditions. I suggest we would have our own Coupling March, to be able to wear our coupling rings on our right hand, outwardly displaying our union as being coupled. I suggest that Holy Matrimony would be restated as Sacred Trust. These are only suggestions and I believe these suggested traditions to be appropriately drawn by consensus by all coupling constituents. We may have an International/National competition to determine the coupling march.
    I am only one man. Can one man make a difference !?!
    The civil unrest of our nation is not unlike the civil unrest resolved on January 13, 1865, by the 13th Amendment (Abraham Lincoln). It is not unlike the civil unrest resolved by the 15th Amendment on February 3rd, 1870 (Martin Luther King Jr.). It is not unlike the civil unrest resolved by the 19th Amendment on August 18th, 1920 (Alice Paul).
    How we handle ourselves now is the example that future generations will learn from their history books in school. You may ask yourself ? Self ? Do I simply be a part of history repeating it’s self or do I learn from history and make history !?!
    For the sanctity of our American democracy, equality for all, marriage and the institution of the sanctity of coupling/same sex coupling, I respectively urge you to have circumspect in your determinations in regards to the “would be ” 28th Amendment of these United States of America.
    Mr. President. PROCLAMATE.
    The compromise of ??/??/????.
    I leave you with this, of which is an excerpt of the compromise of September 9th-20th, 1850:
    “It being desirable, for peace, concord, and harmony of the union of these United States, to settle and adjust amicably all existing questions of controversy between them arising out of the … ”
    and I add,
    ” … Question of Same Sex Unions upon a fair and just basis.”
    Contact your state representatives and
    Roland Menard

    Roland Menard

    December 6, 2008 at 5:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: