Legislative Roundup
Posted by Administrator on March 10, 2008
It has been a busy couple of weeks for The Family Policy Council of West Virginia. Since our last post, we have been working out front and behind the scenes to discourage some policies that would significantly harm the family, we changed our name (from the West Virginia Values Coalition to The Family Policy Council of West Virginia), and continued to lay the foundation for this great organization.Still, we promised you regular updates and we are sorry that the administrative realities have prevented our attention to this lot on the real estate of cyberspace.There will be more to come on this issue, but to begin to resolve what has been (by all accounts) an odd legislative session, consider the following thoughts.
- No “life” legislation passed either house this session. Though 61 bills on the subject of abortion were introduced, 0 moved from their place of introduction.
- Marriages were hardly enriched. It would be wrong to say that marriages were not even discussed in our legislature. Certainly, there was some good debate driven by the proposed “Joint Parenting Act,” a bill introduced to wide bipartisan support. While this bill does much to assist families following a divorce (and is, for that, commendable), little has been done to encourage one man and one woman to life life together at the core of a family.
- Religious freedom afforded ambiguous protection. While The Family Policy Council of West Virginia recommended (and wrote) a piece of legislation that has been supported by everyone from the ACLU to the National Committee on Amish Religious Freedom, the House Committee on the Judiciary passed. There is hope, however, that this issue will find some hearing during an upcoming interim session.
- The legislature got richer. We do not take a position on legislative pay raises; however, we do wish to point out the nepotism involved. Perhaps it was time for an increase in pay, but we would urge our elected officials to consider this issue only after satisfactorily dealing with those issues of prime concern to the electorate. We are gravely disappointed that a paycheck was put before life, marriage, or religious freedom.
- The radical homosexual agenda nearly snuck one through. This is, perhaps, the greatest surprise of any of this legislative session. That S.B. 600 was introduced is not surprising. A version of it has been introduced for more than a decade. In this session, at least 5 bills attempted to provide extra constitutional protection for the homosexual lifestyle. What is surprising is that it passed the Senate (unanimously), but lost votes in the House. While we are delighted that our legislature did not pass a measure that would penalize families for simply abiding by their religious convictions, we are concerned how close our society came.